2.1 sounds good to me. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud
On 17 mai 2013, at 18:46, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > as I was trying to evaluate a JIRA > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-997), I tried to > implement a solution based on ACI. I failed... > > This part of the code needs a serious review. Not that it's buggy, to > some extent, it works, but it's extremly difficult to know what's going > on when we process an operation, as we don't have log. > > I'm afraid that we may want to postpone this to 2.0-RC2, or worse, to 2.1. > > This is one part of the code I haven't looked yet (one of the last one, > with the Triggers and SP, I guess :) so I may be totally off base, but I > don't feel ready to provide any help to any user if we release the > server with this good feature. > > In my opinion, 2.1 is good enough for such an important feature : if > users are aware that fine grained protection is not yet ready, they can > make a sane choice, instead of believing that we do offer a working > authorization system. I seriously don't think that we can update the > doc, fix the code, and learn how to us it, in less than one month anyway. > > Is it just me ? > Any thought ? > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
