Hi,

This is a vote for the 25th milestone of the 1.0.0 LDAP API/Shared, 1.0.0-M25.

It's a bug fix release.

It contains a few bug fixes, and some new features and a better Ldap Connection 
Pool :

Bugs
* DIRAPI-137 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-137> Add Control 
support for  RFC 2891 - LDAP Control Extension for Server Side Sorting of 
Search Results http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2891.html 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-137>
* DIRAPI-174  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-174>LdifReader 
should provide errors wih line number 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-174>
* DIRAPI-184  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-174>Supply one 
method in SearchCursor to judge it has element or not. 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-184>
* DIRAPI-201  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-174>Incossistent 
Import-Package in org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-201>
* DIRAPI-205  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-174>AliasDerefMode 
can't work for API when alias entries can be search out and Server is Sun 
Directory Server <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-205>
* DIRAPI-206  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-174>BindRequest 
logs exception on valid call to setter 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-206>
* DIRAPI-208 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-174> The Connection 
Pool is a bit too aggressive when it comes to validate connections 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-208>


The revision :

http://svn.apache.org/r1637085

The SVN tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M25

The source and binary distribution packages:
http://people.apache.org/~elecharny/

The staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-1013/


Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M25
[ ] 0 abstain
[ ] -1 Do not release Shared/LDAP API 1.0.0-M25


Emmanuel

--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com


Reply via email to