[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn McKinney resolved FC-25.
------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Improve the way Factories create instances
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FC-25
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-25
> Project: FORTRESS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.0-RC27
> Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
> Fix For: 1.0.0-RC40
>
>
> Currently, the various Mgr factories are creating instances for Mgr depending
> on the type of access we want (basically, direct access or via REST).
> We can imagine that we may have more kind of access in the future (remote,
> SOAP yukkk, ... )
> But in any case, I think we can simplify the way we create instances :
> {code}
> accessClassName = AccessMgrImpl.class.getName();
> AccessMgr accessMgr =
> (AccessMgr)ClassUtil.createInstance(accessClassName);
> {code}
> could be written :
> {code}
> AccessMgr accessMgr = new AccessMgrImpl();
> {code}
> We know everything about the class, and we don't even have to pull a
> constructor FQCN from the configuration, the only thing is that we will
> create a new instance depending on some configuration parameter.
> (this is of course when the config does not provide the class name to
> instanciate)
> I also have some concern about the fact that we may want to mix REST and
> other kind of access. Atm, either we have a REST access, or not, but it's
> global and can't be changed, as the IS_EST flag is static and final. Each
> context might access the Mgr in different ways (at least, this is my
> understanding, even if I'm pushing it a bit too far).
> Does it sound reasonnable ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
