I guess it's not such a good idea to impose a minimum JDK version on a minor release. I will revert the pax exam change unless someone thinks it should stay?
Colm. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/05/2015 04:15 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > - <pax-exam.version>3.5.0</pax-exam.version> > > - <pax-url.version>2.2.0</pax-url.version> > > + <pax-exam.version>4.4.0</pax-exam.version> > > + <pax-url.version>2.3.0</pax-url.version> > > When using pax-exam 4.4.0 we need to set compiler level of our projects > to Java 1.7 otherwise the OSGi tests will fail. I'm ok with increasing > the compiler level, but maybe some users still stick to 1.6? > > Kind Regards, > Stefan > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
