Le 08/01/15 21:31, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > On 01/08/2015 10:50 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Le 08/01/15 10:39, Colm O hEigeartaigh a écrit : >>> +1. I'd suggest though releasing one more version supporting JDK 1.6 to >>> allow users time to upgrade. >> Sure. I was not explicit, but we *can* (§and should at this point) keep >> the source target to be 1.6 > When I saw the vote and your text I *implicitely* thought you mean Java > source and compiler target version. Explicit is better than implicit :P
Ok, my bad here. I have been influenced by the suggestion to keep Java 6 as a version we should support for the server, and I wrote that might be a good idea to use Java 7 to build teh server but keeping Java 6 as a JVM we can use to run the server. Considering the dozen errors in ApacheDS with Java 6, I think it's time to be a bit more drastic here and say we only support Java7 for build and run. Sorry for the confusion.
