I'll cancel the vote and get the issue fixed asap. Thanks forcthe thourough checks, Stefan !
Le mercredi 8 avril 2015, Shawn McKinney <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On Apr 8, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > -1 > > > > Main blockers: > > * Maven groupId is org.apache.directory.project, I think it should be > > org.apache.directory.fortress (or just org.apache.fortress)? > > That group was recently changed from org.apache.directory to > org.apache.directory.project. I *think* it due to the inherited pom (for > dependencies). I’ll let Emmanuel chime in. > > > > On Apr 8, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > -1 > > > > Main blockers: > > * Dependency JGraphT 0.7.3 is LGPL, we should consider to update to more > > recent 0.9.1 which has dual licence LGPL or EPL and choose the EPL one. > > > > Good catch. I was wondering where the jgrapht project had gone and now I > know. > > https://github.com/jgrapht/jgrapht > > I have upgraded to the latest. One question - do we now need to include > both license files? > > > > On Apr 8, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > -1 > > > > Additional things to fix: > > * The root folder and the lib folder contain various license files. I > > think only the main LICENSE file should remain in the root folder. Other > > licenses should be moved to a distinctive "licenses" folder. > > * We also need to check which license file are required, compare with > > generated target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES > file. > > * The LICENSE.cmdLineParser.txt is required as source file is included > > (org/apache/directory/fortress/core/cli/CmdLineParser.java) > > * I think the Terracotta license is not required as we only use > > ehcache-core which uses Apache License > > * The NOTICE file does not seem to have the common format. > > I’ll open another ticket for fixing these problems. > > > > On Apr 8, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > -1 > > > > Last question: Is is right that mvn clean install doesn't run any tests? > > (I didn't read the readme yet ;) > > Opted not to run tests on install because of the setup procedures that > need to run prior to testing that could not have been accomplished before > running install for the first time. Yes there are instructions in README > on the prep. First time users are encouraged to follow the steps in the > README-TEN-MINUTE-GUIDE. It has steps for loading the schema, setting up > the base load DIT and finally running the tests. > > Thanks for taking the time to but this detailed list together Stefan! I > don’t mind that we are delayed, most important to get things right. > > Shawn > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
