Hi Colm, Thanks for the good questions.
Some config items like realm are under sections in MIT KDC configuration, like kdc.conf, for these items we do the way to be compatible. Good catch, I thought we should remove the domain one, as it’s only specific to LDAP backend and hasn’t been used at all. TestKdcServer uses the realm “TEST.COM” and I don’t see test failures. What effect are you expecting, or would you let know how to repeat the issue? Maybe you could simplify and illustrate the issue in TestKdcConfigLoad? Thanks. Regards, Kai From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:21 AM To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Kerby KdcConfig question Hi all, Playing around with Kerby a bit. Something I don't understand is the way we configure the server in KdcConfig. For example: public String getKdcDomain() { return getString(KdcConfigKey.KDC_DOMAIN); } However: public String getKdcRealm() { return KrbConfHelper.getStringUnderSection(this, KdcConfigKey.KDC_REALM); } Why is the realm configured differently to the domain? In the TestKdcServer, the value set by has no effect as a result: kdcConfig.setString(KdcConfigKey.KDC_REALM, "TEST.COM<http://TEST.COM>"); Colm. -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
