Currently the 3rd party module is only used by the pki-provider, which isn’t actually really used yet. Is this OK for you Colm?
Regards, Kai From: Zheng, Kai Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:39 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Kerby 3rdparty module Hi Colm, Could we delay on the action? Currently it’s still on early going to support PKINIT, so it’s not clear to me yet how much we would need to modify the 3rd party codes. Note the included one is a modified version after much clean up. Regards, Kai From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:32 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Kerby 3rdparty module Hi all, Currently we include not-yet-commons-ssl in the 3rdpart module in Kerby. This is required for PKCS8 support in the kerby-provider module. However we can just include the dependency (there is a servicemix bundle) here. Should I just go ahead and remove the 3rdparty module, or there a compelling reason to keep it? Colm. -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
