>> I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now. Thank you all for the good consideration, it would be helpful a lot!
Regards, Kai From: Kiran Ayyagari [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 4:11 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: new mailing lists ? On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Le 24/04/15 08:06, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not >> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems >> like those mailing list would be good to have : >> - studio-dev >> - kerby-dev >> - fortress-dev >> >> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ? > +1 for Kerby, there is very much activity > > +0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also > depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs. There is already a fortress ML, which is targetting users and dev. We can move all fortress mails to this existing ML, no urgent need for a fortress-dev atm. > > I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more > activity in the past. Ok. Kiran, I don't think we need a formal vote to create a kerby ML. Should we consider that this is the only ML we need atm ? I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now. -- Kiran Ayyagari http://keydap.com
