Le 11/06/15 11:39, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > Thanks Emmanuel for the quick response! That's quite enough, maybe it's still > good to have 2.0.0 as you said previously, because for some long term > features we probably would use it instead of 2.0.0-RC1?
We can create a 2.0.0 later. No urge. Everything taht will not be included in 1.0.0 will be moved into 2.0.0-RC1 atm, then reshuffled later.
