On 10/15/2015 02:15 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Yes. That's understood. But the fact that this distinction is
artificial might be yet another reason for StringValue and BinaryValue
to have almost the same behavior.
If you mean we should have one single class to handle values, then we
are on teh same page.
One class might be the best solution. But having two classes with a
common superclass that defines most of the behavior is also OK.
IMO, we should stick to the Attribute Syntax that pretty much defines
what can be done on a value. ...
That's right. But we do not have syntax in schema-less mode. And the
Values should work (reasonably) well also in schema-less mode.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
