I would love to see the eSCIMo component being revived and the two similar 
projects being consolidated. Considering the place holder is ready there, we 
could probably trust the party and give them the space to develop in the 
direction, without too much overhead incurred to the left of us I guess.

However, I have some questions to have to ask. Why is Apache Directory a 
natural place for the guys to consider contributing the project to? How is it 
linked with the other components? What’s the rational? Sorry I may have missed 
some discussions before.

+1 on the vote once above questions are addressed. Thanks.

Regards,
Kai

From: Kiran Ayyagari [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 3:30 PM
To: Apache Directory Developers List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Vote] Accept Scim contribution



On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi guys,


two months ago, Shawn Smith wrote us to inform the Apache Directory
project that he wanted to contribute the project he is working on with
Steve Moyer, Christopher Harm and Alex Haskell.


We have discussed about this proposal one month ago, but due to some
highly busy agenda on my side, I sadly forgot to start a vote (and I
have to be frank : would have I started the vote, I would not have had
teh time to deal with the consequences of a positive vote). Now that I'm
done with teh API and ApacheDS releae, and my work on the API branch, my
agenda has cleared up.


So here is a formal vote for the integration of this project in the
apache Directory project, as a sub project. My opinion is that this
would replace eSCIMo that has never been released, unless Kiran decide
otherwise. We would naturally use the existing eSCIMo project web-site
as a plcae-holder. One idea would also be that we could keep the eSCIMo
name, or use SCIMple-Identity, but it would be really up to the people
to decide.
I am fine with using eSCIMo name and site

If we get a positive vote, we will then have to vote the 4 people who
participated to the code as committer - if they want to pursue their
work, of course ! -.  But first, let's vote


[ ] +1, accept the SCIMple-Identity project as a subproject of Apache
Directory
+1, however I may not be able to spend time on this cause of the work I am
doing on another SCIM server (written in Go) and other paid work.

[ ] +/-0 No opinion

[ ] -1 : don't accept the SCIMple-Identity project.


For the record, the code base is available at
https://github.com/PennState/SCIMple-Identity, and it's already under a
AL 2.0 license
(https://github.com/PennState/SCIMple-Identity/blob/develop/LICENSE)

Many thanks, and trully sorry fo rthe delayed vote !
Thank you
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com

Reply via email to