oops, forgot to announce result to dev list….

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Shawn McKinney <[email protected]>
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.0 release (Take 2)
> Date: June 26, 2017 at 11:40:02 AM CDT
> To: [email protected]
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> I am closing the vote in favor of a 2.0.0 GA release. 
> 
> +5 (binding) : Pierre, Emmanuel, Colm, Stefan & I
> +1 (non-binding) : Yudhi
> 
> Thanks to all who participated on this vote, and also to those who have 
> contributed over the years.  Eight years of effort and we’ve still got a ways 
> to go yet... 
> 
> Shawn
> 
>> On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> +1.
>> 
>> Is there a reason that the source packages have to appear at a separate
>> location? Why not just integrate it into the maven build cycle instead?
>> 
>> Colm.
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> - Cheked the packages
>>> 
>>> - Checked the N/L files
>>> 
>>> - Ran the tests
>>> 
>>> 
>>> All is good :-
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 22/06/2017 à 15:59, Shawn McKinney a écrit :
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> This is a second announcement to vote for the next release of Apache
>>> Directory Fortress.
>>>> 
>>>> The version, 2.0.0, has a tag created for git: ‘2.0.0’.
>>>> 
>>>> and the sources may be pulled using git commands:
>>>> git clone --branch 2.0.0 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>> repos/asf/directory-fortress-core.git
>>>> git clone --branch 2.0.0 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>> repos/asf/directory-fortress-realm.git
>>>> git clone --branch 2.0.0 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>> repos/asf/directory-fortress-enmasse.git
>>>> git clone --branch 2.0.0 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>> repos/asf/directory-fortress-commander.git
>>>> 
>>>> with their associated checksums:
>>>> - core:  dbbc09812e14514bc0ebf2a615aafe11b36680aa
>>>> - realm: efcfdb1349fd68a6335faa59bf41b23fa0015a2a
>>>> - rest:  a0a81b4bdf1b9559ad96fdda89c12d40d2093e7e
>>>> - web: fa4999846e8243f976800ae7234801b3562a3cef
>>>> 
>>>> Or, source distros may be downloaded from this location:
>>>> http://home.apache.org/~smckinney/
>>>> 
>>>> The staging repos on Nexus:
>>>> - core: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachedirectory-1141
>>>> - realm: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachedirectory-1142
>>>> - rest: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachedirectory-1144
>>>> - web: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachedirectory-1143
>>>> 
>>>> Test using one of these:
>>>> * https://github.com/apache/directory-fortress-core/blob/
>>> master/README-QUICKSTART-DOCKER-APACHEDS.md
>>>> * https://github.com/apache/directory-fortress-core/blob/
>>> master/README-QUICKSTART-APACHEDS.md
>>>> * https://github.com/apache/directory-fortress-core/blob/
>>> master/README-QUICKSTART-DOCKER-SLAPD.md
>>>> * https://github.com/apache/directory-fortress-core/blob/
>>> master/README-QUICKSTART-SLAPD.md
>>>> 
>>>> - Choose one of the above.  Complete (only) the sections leading up to
>>> and including the SECTION entitled: 'Apache Fortress Core Integration Test’
>>>> - Choose the docker quickstart & save time.  Won't have to install an
>>> LDAP server for the integration tests.
>>>> 
>>>> 2.0.0 includes:
>>>> - Requires Java 8
>>>> - Update to use Apache LDAP API v1.0.0 and ADS 2.0.0-M24
>>>> - FC-209 Missing object classes when create permission attribute and sets
>>>> - FC-210 Programtically determine which methods have ARBAC checks
>>>> - FC-211 Support apacheds password policies
>>>> - FC-212 ApacheDS in Docker
>>>> 
>>>> Please vote:
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1 | Release Fortress core, realm, rest and web 2.0.0
>>>> [ ] +/-0 | Abstain
>>>> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* Release Fortress core, realm, rest and web 2.0.0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Shawn
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Emmanuel Lecharny
>>> 
>>> Symas.com
>>> directory.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>> 
>> Talend Community Coder
>> http://coders.talend.com
> 

Reply via email to