I had pretty good luck with git-svn in the past... I think it would be worth starting at the first 2.0.0 revision and dropping the rest...
On Aug 20, 2017 5:32 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi ! > > > I have started the migration on saturday afternoon (actually, on > saturday morning, but I had to start it 3 times, because it faled due to > some missing authors in the file containing the authors...). > > > So basically, it's running now for ... more than 32h ! : > > > 503 45027 45026 0 8:29AM ttys002 32:11.09 /usr/bin/perl > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/libexec/git-core/git-svn > clone https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared --no-metadata -A > authors-transform.txt --stdlayout /Users/elecharny/temp > > > And I'm not seeing it being completed before a few days :/ It's still > processing the 0.9.5 tag, which is 9 years old, and we have 59 tags ! > > > So... I'm willing to let the tool running a couple of more days, to see > where it brings us, but at some point, we should probably decide that we > should start form a fresh copy of trunk, and inject it into git, with no > history (as we still have the history in SVN anyway...) > > > Unless someone has a better idea, like using a faster tool to convert > the repo than svn2git ? > > > Thanks for any suggestion... > > -- > Emmanuel Lecharny > > Symas.com > directory.apache.org > >
