On 10/02/2017 10:50 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > > Le 02/10/2017 à 09:19, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : >> On 10/02/2017 05:34 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >>>> For studio and apacheds as they are still in SVN we can do that. But I >>>> hope the git mirrors like such a move because we want to use them then >>>> for git migration. >>> Good question... We can also try a merge instead. >> The other option is to move to git first. > > Indeed. > > Studio has been released, it's a good timing to have it migrated to git. > The remaining parts are : > - project (no brainer) > - apacheds ( I still have a few commits to apply, but that would be fast) > - kerberos-client (no brainer) > - checkstyle-configuration (no brainer) > - junit-addons (no brainer) > - apacheds-manuals (unused) > - ldap-api-manuals (unused) > - jdbm (no brainer) > - mavibot ( have some pending modifications for this one) > - skins (no brainer) > - docker (no brainer)
Ok, let's do it. I'll start a formal vote for the git migration. I think now that gitbox is enabled for us we can just create new repos there, right? Kind Regards, Stefan
