Ludovic Poitou wrote:
Hey Emmanuel,
OpenDJ has had support for RFC4518 since version 1.0 of OpenDS.
Btw, afaik, all of the tests of servers outside OpenLDAP were done without any
specific tuning. And for DJ it meant that it was running with a 2GB JVM and
almost no cache.
Actually no; we tuned each server according to its documentation. All of the
results we reported are based on the optimal settings obtained after tweaking
cache and indexing configs, and multiple slamd optimizing jobs. We spent
multiple days tuning each server.
My 2 cents,
Ludo
—
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.com
On 29 November 2017 at 07:17:13, Emmanuel Lécharny ([email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:
Le 29/11/2017 à 06:44, Howard Chu a écrit :
> Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 28/11/2017 à 15:44, Marc Boorshtein a écrit :
>>> Just curious, has anyone compared the two from a performance
>>> standpoint?
>>
>> No, and it's even more difficult now that OpenDJ is close source.
>
> An older eval is in
> http://www.lmdb.tech/SymasDocs/2014-LOADays-jkozyra.pdf
Thanks Howard.
I suspect there might be an issue with the ApacheDS search numbers on
these tests though : on my old machine (a Mac), I was able to reach more
than 10 000 search request/s, with a correct tuning (cache... damn cache).
That would be interesting to conduct some new benchs for X-mas :-)
I forgot to mention that ApacheDS does fully implement
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4518, which is awfully costly. I'm not
sure at all OpenDJ supports that.
--
Emmanuel Lecharny
Symas.com
directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org>
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
