Thanks Emmanuel. I've started closing old completed issues in the current repository and will migrate those that are left. We should be able to get the code moved over in the next day or two as well.
Would it be preferable to put the Apache license comments in before we migrate? I'd rather do any required package naming changes after the move so that we don't potentially break people who are currently using it. And one last question, is it alright to change the README on the Penn State SCIMple site to start pushing traffic to the Apache repo as soon as it is moved, or are there other intermediate steps we should take? Shawn ________________________________ From: Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 4:35:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SCIMple, current state of Apache LDAP 2.0, and Java 9/10/11 On 07/02/2018 07:58 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > Thanks Emmanuel! > > On 07/02/2018 03:30 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> ApacheDS : >> ---------- >> >> - I have fixed the failing startTLS test (which was in fact an LDAP API >> error : the SslFilter was not added to the chain) >> - ApacheDS is now building fine >> >> I think I will start to cut a release of the Apache LDAP API 2.0.0-AM1 >> (first milestone before a release) and a ApachedS 2.0.0-AM25. I just >> have to test if Studio works fine with both those guys. Will do that one >> of those coming evenings, when teh baby will sleep ;-) > > I can help with testing Studio. Good news, all Studio tests are back to stable so I'm pretty confident that everything is fine. Good job, Emmanuel! I'll try to test Studio with Java 11 and check if it makes sense to upgrade from Oxygen to Photon right now.
