pom's and .g4's now have the license in the header.
Thanks, Shawn ________________________________ From: Smith, Shawn Eion <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 9:58:37 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PSU SCIMple donation How many times can I spell your name wrong... Apologies and thanks Stefan. ________________________________ From: Smith, Shawn Eion <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2018 8:40:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PSU SCIMple donation Just saw my typo, thanks Stephan.. Get Outlook for Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7Cses44%40psu.edu%7C83be013f924c4c8d102a08d5eab4d41c%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636672984744838154&sdata=wkXktT8OBPfCKz%2FL2vQCgHP5jGglaoFuDtWjJmygfKY%3D&reserved=0> ________________________________ From: Smith, Shawn Eion Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2018 2:02:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PSU SCIMple donation Thanks Sefan, I'll get those corrected. ________________________________ From: Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 12:48:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PSU SCIMple donation Hi Shawn, On 06/18/2018 09:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > Do you want to push the code yourself? I see the code was pushed and you already added the Apache License header to the Java files and renamed the packages, thanks for that :) I run a apache-rat check, the remaining files that need the license header in order to finish up the IP clearance are: * all the pom.xmls * all the antlr *.g4 files I think the SCIM JSON schema files don't need a license header (and can be excluded from RAT check) since they are defined in RFCs, correct? (and JSON doesn't support comments anyway...) Kind Regards, Stefan
