FYI. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking building the process.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists for DL. - Sijie On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this > version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki. > > I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure: https://cwiki. > apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Preparing+DistributedLog+Releases > > - Sijie > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking forward to >> see bookkeeper 4.5. >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update. >> > >> > -Flavio >> > >> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > Flavio, >> > > >> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is not >> great >> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've >> discussed >> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment to >> > merge >> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't >> maintain >> > our >> > > own branch and switch to 4.5. >> > > >> > > Hope this make sense. >> > > >> > > Sijie >> > > >> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache BookKeeper >> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to use >> the >> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache >> BookKeeper. >> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd be >> more >> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases, >> which >> > are >> > > community driven. >> > > >> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is >> important >> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to fix >> > DL-2. >> > > >> > > -Flavio >> > > >> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart <lstew...@twitter.com.INVALID >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> +1 >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <franck.c...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker. >> > >>> >> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> - Xi >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim < >> > khurrumnas...@gmail.com> >> > >>>> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> - kn >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. There >> are >> > >>>>> still a >> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we need to >> > >>> pick >> > >>>>> up a >> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from there. >> > Here >> > >>>> is >> > >>>>> a >> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: Repackaging >> > >>>>> namespace >> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing) >> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: support >> > scala >> > >>>>> 2.10 >> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged) >> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move DL >> to >> > >>>> depend >> > >>>>>> on >> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift >> version, >> > >>>>> which >> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull request >> out. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2 >> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the official >> > >>>>>> bookkeeper >> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new >> release >> > >>>> once >> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure >> between >> > DL >> > >>>> and >> > >>>>>> BK. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should be >> > >>>> included >> > >>>>> in >> > >>>>>> the first release. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager for >> > >>> first >> > >>>>>> release? >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> - Sijie >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> -franck >> > >>> >> > >> > >> > >
