seems reasonable to me. do you want to update the wiki to reflect it? On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think there is not a lot of activities on proposals. A 'lazy approval' > might be just good enough - a proposal with lazy approval is implicitly > allowed/accepted unless a -1 vote is received. That's probably the best > for now. what do you think? > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Ping? > > > > Xi, Jon, any updates about this? Do any of you want to drive this? > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Sijie Guo <sij...@twitter.com.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Xi, Jon, are any of you interested in making a draft about about the > > > proposal workflow? > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Jon Derrick < > > jonathan.derri...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I think it really worth having a voting proposal, as sometime I might > > > lose > > > > track of if a proposal is accepted or not and whether it is under > > > > development. > > > > > > > > Beam's process looks promising. You can try to start with that. > > > > > > > > Another suggestion is it would be awesome if the DL jira queue can > have > > > new > > > > type, called 'Proposal'. Then we can enforce the proposal workflow in > > the > > > > jira. > > > > > > > > > > I think it is possible to ask INFRA team to create a new jira > > type/workflow > > > for us, if we can come up with more details. Can you tell us more about > > > your thoughts? > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thank you Sijie. I feel it is good to have a voting process, so > that > > it > > > > > would be good to track if a proposal is accepted for developing or > > > > > discarded due to any reasons. I will start with my proposal and see > > how > > > > it > > > > > is going with the community. > > > > > > > > > > - Xi > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Xi, thank you for raising this up. I don't think we have a formal > > > > process > > > > > > for track proposals. I think we can learn the proposals from > other > > > > apache > > > > > > projects. For example, beam has very nice documentation on > > > contribution > > > > > > guide (http://beam.incubator.apache.org/contribute/contribution- > > > guide/ > > > > ). > > > > > > We > > > > > > probably can adopt it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't feel strong about the voting process. If it is easier for > > > > making > > > > > > conclusion on the proposal discussion, let's vote for any > discussed > > > > > > proposal. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is great that we have a process to track/discuss proposals. > > but > > > > the > > > > > > > process is still a bit unclear to me. do we need a vote phase > to > > > > adopt > > > > > > the > > > > > > > proposals? and shall we document the process in wiki page? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my basic understand about the process is: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - create a proposal wiki page to describe the proposal > > > > > > > - start the '[discussion]' email thread for the proposal > > > > > > > - conversation will happen in the '[discussion]' email thread > and > > > the > > > > > > wiki > > > > > > > page will be refined > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel there will be a phase to decide whether this proposal > will > > > be > > > > > > > accepted or discarded and update the state of the proposals. > > shall > > > I > > > > > vote > > > > > > > DP-2? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Xi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > - jderrick > > > > > > > > > >
