On 2019/06/26 20:55:52, Naomi S <[email protected]> wrote: > if you can’t justify that rule beyond “that’s how we do it”, it’s a useless> > rule and should be abandoned. if you can’t find a reason beyond “we should> > be neutral”, that’s the end of the productive discussion as far as I’m> > concerned lol> > It has been justified numerous times by several people. It has been a guiding principle for decades. Now you are free to ignore all that, or disregard that (you can't teach people who refuse to learn), but pretending that the only justification that has ever been made for it is "that’s how we do it" is just plain silly and disingenuous and so obviously false that I am somewhat embarrassed to even respond to it.
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framew... Myrle Krantz
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framew... Naomi S
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framew... Sage Sharp
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Myrle Krantz
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Sage Sharp
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Awasum Yannick
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Ross Gardler
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Patricia Shanahan
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework propo... Ross Gardler
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework ... Sage Sharp
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framew... Patricia Shanahan
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framew... Ross Gardler
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framew... Patricia Shanahan
