I am suggesting that when the design can strongly influence the outcome, it would mean; a. the design could be (depending on the bias) be tailored for a desirable outcome, b. the outcome not being reliable (and accepted), as one could always criticize the design, one way or the other.
Niclas On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 9:53 AM Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: > Wait, you're suggesting throwing out *all* surveys because they're hard > to use? > > All I was saying is that survey design is paramount and needs careful > consideration, which is why we're contracting this out to a paid expert. > It's a good decision, I think. > > On 2019-07-16 9:38 p.m., Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:40 AM Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> This is *not* a simple topic and just a single word or > >> layout choice can change the results of your entire survey. Perilous!) > >> > > > > And that doesn't sets off all the warning lights on the panel?? In my > book, > > a methodology that is that volatile shouldn't be used, and better > > approaches should be searched for. > > > > // Niclas > > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
