I thought it was individuals signing the mentor agreements at least, though it’s been a while since I filled that out.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 20:55, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:07 PM Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 4:00 AM Griselda Cuevas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > What's coming next: > > > - Katia, Awasum and Matt will have full autonomy to work as the ASF > > > outreachy coordinators. I've asked them to share updates with the > committee > > > weekly from now until we launch > > > > > > > One small nitpick, and it could be me misinterpreting the language; > > > > "full autonomy" can't be delegated to a non-officer of ASF. Any > commitment > > on behalf of the ASF requires an officer, and that it is within the > > officer's mandate. > > > > I hope/assume that you mean, that they will do a lot of the work, keep > you > > in the loop and any official agreement/commitment on behalf of ASF is in > > your hands, preferably consulted with President (ultimately responsible > for > > a bad decision) and possibly helpful (ex-)Directors. > > The closest parallel I see is that VP Conferences (Rich) has > designated a number of (non-officer) Event Coordinators, each of which > is the key decision maker for that event. If coodinators are > producing weekly reports I'm confident that the oversight requirements > will be amply met, particularly given the number of current and > previous Directors on this committee. > > Signing authority could conceivably be a concern, but Outreachy only > requires interns and mentors to sign agreements. This does bring up > an interesting question: are mentors signing as individuals or on > behalf of the ASF. Perhaps someone could reach to Mozilla to see how > they handle this? > > - Sam Ruby > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
