On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 16:41, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > > and we > > publish the minutes of those meetings regularly. Similarly in the Outreachy > > meetings, we’ve been recording and publishing minutes. I consider both > > meetings to be particularly useful for finalizing decisions that involve > > two or more people (board for resolutions, smaller meetings for informal > > equivalents). > > > > To make both compatible as possible with the Apache Way, the date and times > > are scheduled ahead of time and are generally open to anyone who wants to > > attend > > Good advice for PMCs, but not a hard requirement for other committees. > In fact, we have ample examples where such is an anti-pattern, > particularly when meeting with external companies.
That's why I said "two or more people". Let me clarify that as "two or more Apache folk". From an operational perspective, if you have one Apache person in charge, then there's no need for a meeting. This doesn't necessarily mean that any officer's actions require this type of formality. > If you would like to discuss this further, I'd suggest [email protected]. That could be useful for helping clarify when it's particularly useful to use open synchronous meetings versus officer actions without the need for added bureaucracy. -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
