planners@ is a public list with vendors & sponsors. I have no good answer for how I would have done this differently but your idea isn't a bad one. I would likely have done the opposite though and point out the board@ thread and pointed other lists there. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:47 PM Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > How about not crossposting but instead posting a separate pointer on board@ > . > > That way the followups stay limited to one list. > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:58 AM Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I think the message needed cross posting to bring it to the attention of > > people on the board, dealing with roadshows/cons and those dealing with > > diversity. But I didn't think it belonged on members@. > > > > Where would you suggest it have been posted? > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019, 07:56 Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:58 Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > But: the diversity committee is not responsible for CoC enforcement, > so > > > > this is just philosophizing here. It would be on-topic on the > > planners@ > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > Fwiw the original message was crossposted to three lists. (I wish > people > > > wouldn't do that.) The discussion over on planners@ was very > productive, > > > I > > > think. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
