Hi - I think that the CLC application’s UI is what caused the negative reaction. It looks like a scoring system because it presents that way. This may be fine, but if your purpose is evaluate what you can do to improve your repository a more exploratory system would be more helpful and less intimidating.
(1) There are actually only a few words that are being flagged. Ones that are problematic according to the context. (2) I don’t think that scorekeeping is helpful, but search would be. What if repositories were indexed in Apache Solr and guided search forms created? The results could be in Solr’s default UI. A project could then perform whatever research they wanted. Putting repositories into a search engine serves other purposes as well. Regards, Dave
