On Sat, 4 Sept 2021 at 14:16, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > While this is absolutely true, our mandate is to grow developer communities > and the diversity thereof. As such it is that audience - the code-readers - > which we are primarily concerned with, right? >
Is the remit of D&I that narrow? What about readers of the ASF websites and users of ASF software? Besides, a potential developer probably starts by reading about some ASF software, and studies the user docs before wanting to engage as a developer. > Shosholoza, > Rich > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021, 07:25 sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The CLC tool currently considers all source files to be equal. > > > > However in terms of the effect on readers, documentation (e.g. > > website, user guides) is far more likely to cause upset. > > > > This is mainly because it has a wider readership. > > > > Also people reading code will likely understand that words are > > generally being used in their technical sense. And they may also > > appreciate that it can be a lot harder to change such words. > > > > Sebb > >
