The email one though is connected with keeping PII though ? (Personally Identifiable Information) - so I guess that one would require at least some discussion with the privacy team ?
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 1:25 PM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 8/15/25 13:14, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > One question - I understand the survey is anonymous, but is there a way > to > > distinguish several answers from the same person (or at the very least > > browser, due to anonymity). Just thinking of some "gaming" scenarios - > ASF > > people are smart and might get the idea to increase chances of their > choice > > by responding to the survey several times (I just did with the low rating > > for poor pony choices ;) ) . > > Great question, and thankfully one that I already asked myself as well, > so I have some answers for you. > > For surveys aimed at either a set group of people (like committers, > members, etc), we can make use of closed, individual links. We can > pre-generate these in advance to ensure only one submission per person. > > For wider, open audiences, we can use email verification to at least > limit responses to one per email address. This would require anyone > wanting to submit a survey to first verify their email address with the > system through a callback link sent to their email address. > > With the latter you could presumably also filter out obvious attempts at > gaming any sort of survey, though I would hope we don't have to do that. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 10:27 AM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> On 8/15/25 09:53, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >>> This tool is great. Works flawlessly. But I think the choice of ponies > >> was > >>> very limited, so you should try harder :) > >> > >> That's why we have the "how did we do?" questions at the end :-D > >> > >>> > >>> J. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 9:23 AM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello again, wonderful D&I folks. > >>>> > >>>> I have been experimenting with a self-hosted tool for conducting > surveys > >>>> and collecting feedback/reviews, and things are looking pretty decent. > >>>> > >>>> I'd love to get some feedback from the people on this list, so that we > >>>> can perhaps decide on using this tool or not and discuss some basic > >>>> premises for conducting surveys in the future. > >>>> > >>>> You can try a survey demo here: > >>>> https://surveys.diversity.apache.org/s/wcee4v8ygw8q0pih0nflnxl1 > >>>> > >>>> Those of you on the D&I committee[1] who wants to try their hands at > the > >>>> behind-the-scenes work with surveys can let me know (private or this > >>>> list), and I'll set you up with access to manage surveys yourselves. > >>>> This will also allow you to see the results of surveys in various > ways. > >>>> > >>>> I have built a template for our surveys that comes with a standard > >>>> introduction and a data consent form at the very end; you should be > able > >>>> to see that in the survey demo I linked to. I had the wording in the > >>>> template refined by our resident "editor-in-chief", Andrew Wetmore, > but > >>>> things can always be improved upon further, so do not hesitate to > >>>> suggest changes. > >>>> > >>>> There isn't a whole lot more to say, take the survey for a spin and > see > >>>> if this survey tool fits the brief. > >>>> > >>>> With regards, > >>>> Daniel. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1] Access to survey administration is restricted to members of the > D&I > >>>> committee for data privacy reasons; this is explained in more detail > in > >>>> the survey itself. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
