hi >> I was told that the Mac project had given up on ever doing an Aqua >> version. And that their current goal was to have an X11 version that >> is no more than 6 months behind. > >This is simply not true and this infos hurt a lot the Mac Team. The >Aqua port is still not there, but the team is growing and Eric B. and >several others are learning Cocoa. That won't be easy, that's why they >really need our support, but the X11 port is here for the 2.0 and they >are working on an installer which will have an Aqua-like icon. (I have >to ask the Art project to design this icon :). Very few issues are >remaining for this port, and all the testers are really happy with it >at the moment.
This is very true. And as I speak, I am also running Eric's excellent 680 X11 port of Mac OS X. Looks and works great. Believe it or not, quite a few uses do in fact like the X11 port; they'll really like the 680 version. No, it's not Aqua yet, and yes, it uses X11. For that reason, endusers should be given the option of NeoOffice/J. But the X11 port under Eric is doing very well indeed. :-) > >Kind regards Sophie > > Cheers Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
