On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 20:15 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > As an outside group, OOoAuthors is free to use whatever license it > > likes. I have no problem with that. Just that items from OOoAuthors must > > be non-editable to be included on http://documentation.openoffice.org/ > > This is certainly in keeping with the links you provided but, where does > > it say that these are what OOo will use? > > I don't understand your complaint. You require from us non-editable > documents, and you get them with the source easily available. > > What am I missing? >
I think that there is an assumption that OOo in general must accept whatever license that the submitter chooses. Unfortunately this is not the case. Accepted projects have to follow certain rules that are set at the CC. So the doc project is caught between a rock and a hard place until this is resolved. That means no sources for OOoAuthors docs in the repository and, at the moment, no links. I just think it is a confusing and somewhat un-necessary complication to an already complicated system. This probably doesn't make things any clearer but I have tried. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
