On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 18:03 -0800, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 16:49 -0800, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > >> > >>Why not open the 1.x template and save it as an OTT, then build > >>your ODT document from there? That's what I would do. > >> > >>GRS, would that be a reasonable way for Peter to proceed? Maybe > >>we (I?) should make an OTT version of the template? > > > > Not really necessary. OOo2 will use the existing template with no > > problem. If you or Peter really need it in that format, please do what > > you want. For myself, I think it is a waste of time and effort to go > > through this exercise when it will work without problems in both > > incarnations of OOo. > > > > Knowing this, what do you think? > > I agree, making a .ott isn't necessary, but since the only > template is in .stw, Peter (and others) might get the impression > that the resulting documents should be .sxw instead of .odt. >
Either way is okay with me. :-) Just like authors submissions are reviewed and edited as necessary to fit. I would guess though that contributors will figure this out, at least. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
