Frank Peters wrote:
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
I would second Andre in allowing wiki pages to specify a license
and have a default license for pages that do not specify the their
license.
That seems good to me, too... But I'd rather not allow for even the
possibility of proprietary licenses on the wiki, which the wording
suggested seems to permit, as does our current wording. Ie, I want
open licenses.
There is some stuff in, I think, Creative Commons licenses that
Jean would like to put on the wiki. Jean?
OOoAuthors work is currently licensed under CC-BY 2.5 or later
(we'll be progressively updating this to say 3.0 or later).
To allow for the possibility of this material being placed on the
wiki with minimal fuss, I request the Community Council to
approve this as an acceptable license for the wiki, at the same
time as they vote on the wording of the licensing proposal for
the wiki.
Louis, I can send this as a separate CC agenda item if you wish.
--Jean
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
