Is there some reason, besides precedence, that you would again use a dbf format?
On 7/10/07, Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, On 2007-07-09, at 06:42 , Jacqueline Rahemipour wrote: > Hi all, > > I asked this already some months ago on a different mailinglist, > but now its time to start with the work :-) I'm not sure which list replied... But adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] to cc list. Apologies for duplication. > > The version 2 is out now for a long time, but the records of the > bibliography database still show only literature which fits to > version 1.x. > > Some users complain about the existing records in general, because > they have to be removed manually. On the other hand the > bibliography database is often used as example for the modul base > or for mail merge. > > So I suggest following: > > Remove all records from biblio.dbf, add a second file samples.dbf > to collect literature for OOo 2x. > > I would like to update the database records now and ask other > native-lang projects to provide lists with their literature. > > If you want to help me and like to see your literature included > too, please send me following information: > > Author > Pages > Publisher > Title > Year > ISBN > Language > > I will include the language in the existing field custom1. I think, > it doesn't matter, because we use a seperat file. > > Send your file directly to my email-adress or attach it to issue > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79392 > > I think, this has also a positive marketing effect, if users see, > that there is much literature about OOo 2. > > Thanks for your help, > > Jacqueline Rahemipour > > -- > ## Co-Lead de.openoffice.org > ## http://de.openoffice.org - www.openoffice.org > ## Vorstand OpenOffice.org Deutschland e.V. > ## Mitglieder willkommen: www.OOoDeV.org Best louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
