Therefore, I personally think that implementing the polling algorithm while ignoring the performance of the machine itself cannot achieve true load balancing.
Best wishes！ CalvinKirs On 2020/07/18 14:12:52, Kris Calvin <[email protected]> wrote: > Let me give an example. It might be better. Suppose my computer A has twice> > the processing power of computer B. Then I have three tasks. According to> > the polling algorithm, A will handle two and B will handle one. Isn't our> > purpose of load balancing to make each machine work evenly?> > > Best wishes！> > CalvinKirs>> > > On 2020/07/18 13:56:38, lidong dai <[email protected]> wrote:> > > I have a little confused about adding a weight to what you said, like>> > > assign tasks to machines in turn, there is normally no weights>> > >> > >> > >> > > Best Regards>> > > --------------->> > > DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC>> > > Lidong Dai 代立冬>> > > [email protected]>> > > --------------->> > >> > >> > > CalvinKirs <[email protected]> 于2020年7月18日周六 下午5:55写道：>> > >> > > > Hi, everyone. I’m currently designing weight-based load balancing. My>> > > > point of view is that all load balancing needs to be done based on> > weights,>> > > > because load actually means that machines with good performance are>> > > > expected to handle more tasks. Therefore, weights should be Reflected> > in>> > > > each load balancing algorithm, it should be a default attribute in> > load>> > > > balancing.>> > > >>> > > > Hope to get your suggestions.>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > Best wishes！>> > > > CalvinKirs>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> >
