and thanks for Furkan and Sheng's reminder,  everything happens about
DolphinScheduler should be an open way



Best Regards
---------------
DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Lidong Dai 代立冬
[email protected]
---------------


On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:25 AM lidong dai <[email protected]> wrote:

> hi,
>  This is not a formal meeting, just to understand what the developers
> think about DolphinScheduler, so I didn’t inform you in advance when the
> meeting was held in the email list.   I think we could hold online meeting
> to discuss the topic about "how to refactor"  this week
>
>
> Best Regards
> ---------------
> DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
> Lidong Dai 代立冬
> [email protected]
> ---------------
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:01 AM Sheng Wu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Calvin
>>
>> I think you misunderstood the point about Furkan's asking. He was asking
>> about how do you set up the meeting which should be an open way.
>>
>> Sheng Wu 吴晟
>> Twitter, wusheng1108
>>
>>
>> CalvinKirs <[email protected]> 于2020年11月23日周一 上午9:47写道:
>>
>> > Hi Furkan, welcome very much. This meeting is a Chinese video
>> conference.
>> > We will send meeting invitations in the Chinese contributor exchange
>> group.
>> > The relevant design conclusions will be reflected in the dev mailing
>> list,
>> > and you are very welcome to discuss with you in the mail.
>> >
>> >
>> > In addition, thank you very much for your reminder. :in the later days
>> > later online meetings, we will send meeting invitations in advance on
>> the
>> > mailing list, and you can also communicate with us during the meeting.
>> >
>> >
>> > Best  wishes!
>> > CalvinKirs
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/22/2020 23:05,Furkan KAMACI<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi BoYi,
>> >
>> > May I learn at where you decided to do this meeting (slack, mail list
>> > etc.)?
>> >
>> > Kind Regards,
>> > Furkan KAMACI
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:21 AM wu shaoj <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Cool, excellent meeting
>> >
>> >
>> > From: boyi <[email protected]>
>> > Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 15:18
>> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> > Subject: [Online Meeting Invitation]DolphinScheduler refactor
>> > meeting(Second)
>> > [Online Meeting Invitation]DolphinScheduler refactor meeting(Second)
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi, DolphinScheduler Community:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > We discussed the DolphinScheduler reconstruction workflow definition
>> > storage structure (split JSON data) at 2020-11-17 19:00 Beijing time. A
>> > total of 10+ partners participated in this meeting. The discussion
>> > information of the meeting is as follows:
>> >
>> >
>> > 1: Currently, we provide an idea of splitting the workflow definition
>> > table (t_ds_process_definition) into two tables. The data structure
>> > information is as follows:
>> >
>> >
>> > t_ds_process_definition[subject table] and t_ds_process_definition_task
>> > [task detail table]
>> >
>> >
>> > |  t_ds_process_definition |
>> > | name | type | describe |
>> > | id | int(11) | id |
>> > | name | varchar(255) | process definition name |
>> > | version | int(11) | process definition version |
>> > | release_state | tinyint(4) | 0 is not online, 1 is online |
>> > | project_id | int(11) | project id |
>> > | user_id | int(11) | user id |
>> > | description | text | description |
>> > | global_params | text | global params |
>> > | flag | tinyint(4) | 0 is not available, 1 is available |
>> > | receivers | text | addressee |
>> > | receivers_cc | text | CC person |
>> > | create_time | datetime | create time |
>> > | timeout | int(11) | time out |
>> > | tenant_id | int(11) | tenant id |
>> > | update_time | datetime | update time |
>> > | modify_by | varchar(36) | modify by user name |
>> >
>> >
>> > | t_ds_process_definition_task  |
>> > | name | type | describe |
>> > | id | int(11) | task id |
>> > | name | varchar(255) | task name |
>> > | type | varchar(64) | type  [SHLL,PYTHON,DATAX,SPARK 等等 ] |
>> > | process_definition_id | int(11) | process definition id |
>> > | params | longtext | custom parameters  [JSON ] |
>> > | description | text | description |
>> > | runFlag | tinyint(4) | operation identification |
>> > | conditionResult | longtext | conditional branch [JSON ] |
>> > | dependence | longtext | task dependency [JSON ] |
>> > | maxRetryTimes | tinyint(4) | max retry times |
>> > | retryInterval | tinyint(4) | retry interval |
>> > | timeout | varchar(128) | time out [JSON ] |
>> > | taskInstancePriority | varchar(16) | task priority |
>> > | workerGroup | varchar(64) | worker group name |
>> > | preTasks | varchar(128) | pre task |
>> > | locations | text | dag location |
>> > | connects | text | dag connect |
>> > | resource | varchar(255) | resouce mark |
>> > | datasource | varchar(255) | datasource mark |
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2: Consider whether you need a third table to store the dependencies
>> > between tasks, mainly for workflow dependent nodes, condition judgments,
>> > and task bloodlines for higher-level abstraction. Split into the third
>> > table.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 3. Identify the issues to be discussed in the next meeting
>> > 3.1. Is the workflow definition table split into two tables or into
>> > three tables?
>> > 3.2. How to store data sources and resource files
>> > 3.3. How to store workflow task instances without affecting
>> > re-running, and to support existing functions such as editing workflow
>> > definitions.
>> > 3.4. Workflow definition version issue
>> >
>> >
>> > We are very grateful to the following friends for their discussions:
>> > dailidong, lgcareer, CalvinKirs, Rubik-W, leonbao, zixi0825,
>> JinyLeeChina,
>> > chenxingchun, BoYiZhang, etc. They provided a lot of effective
>> suggestions
>> > for this meeting.
>> >
>> >
>> > At the same time, the community also hopes that more people can
>> > participate. Thank you very much.
>> >
>> >
>> > Best  wishes!
>> > BoYiZhang
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> > hi,DolphinScheduler 社区:
>> >
>> >
>> > 我们在北京时间2020-11-17
>> >
>> 19:00针对DolphinScheduler重构工作流定义存储结构(拆大JSON)进行了讨论,共有10+位伙伴参与了本次会议,会议讨论信息如下:
>> >
>> >
>> > 1:目前提供一个将工作流定义表(t_ds_process_definition)拆分为两张表的思路,数据结构信息如下 :
>> > t_ds_process_definition[主体表] 和 t_ds_process_definition_task [任务详情表]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2:考虑是否需要第三张表存储任务之间的依赖关系, 主要针对工作流依赖节点,条件判断,任务血缘进行更高层级的抽象.拆分成第三张表.
>> >
>> >
>> > |  t_ds_process_definition[主体表]  |
>> > | 序号 | 字段 | 类型 | 描述 |
>> > | 1 | id | int(11) | 主键 |
>> > | 2 | name | varchar(255) | 流程定义名称 |
>> > | 3 | version | int(11) | 流程定义版本 |
>> > | 4 | release_state | tinyint(4) | 流程定义的发布状态:0 未上线 , 1已上线 |
>> > | 5 | project_id | int(11) | 项目id |
>> > | 6 | user_id | int(11) | 流程定义所属用户id |
>> > | 7 | description | text | 流程定义描述 |
>> > | 8 | global_params | text | 全局参数 |
>> > | 9 | flag | tinyint(4) | 流程是否可用:0 不可用,1 可用 |
>> > | 10 | receivers | text | 收件人 |
>> > | 11 | receivers_cc | text | 抄送人 |
>> > | 12 | create_time | datetime | 创建时间 |
>> > | 13 | timeout | int(11) | 超时时间 |
>> > | 14 | tenant_id | int(11) | 租户id |
>> > | 15 | update_time | datetime | 更新时间 |
>> > | 16 | modify_by | varchar(36) | 修改用户 |
>> >
>> >
>> > | t_ds_process_definition_task [任务详情表] |
>> > | 序号 | 参数名 | 类型 | 描述 |
>> > | 1 | id | int(11) | 任务id |
>> > | 2 | name | varchar(255) | 任务名称 |
>> > | 3 | type | varchar(64) | 类型 [SHLL,PYTHON,DATAX,SPARK 等等 ] |
>> > | 4 | process_definition_id | int(11) | 流程定义id |
>> > | 5 | params | longtext | 自定义参数 [ Json 格式 保存原有的params字段,
>> 自定义参数和资源文件参数是否拆出
>> > ] |
>> > | 6 | description | text | 描述 |
>> > | 7 | runFlag | tinyint(4) | 运行标识 |
>> > | 8 | conditionResult | longtext | 条件分支 [JSON格式] |
>> > | 9 | dependence | longtext | 任务依赖  [JSON格式] |
>> > | 10 | maxRetryTimes | tinyint(4) | 最大重试次数 |
>> > | 11 | retryInterval | tinyint(4) | 重试间隔 |
>> > | 12 | timeout | varchar(128) | 超时控制策略 [JSON格式] |
>> > | 13 | taskInstancePriority | varchar(16) | 任务优先级 |
>> > | 14 | workerGroup | varchar(64) | Worker 分组名称 |
>> > | 15 | preTasks | varchar(128) | 前置任务 |
>> > | 16 | locations | text | 节点坐标信息 |
>> > | 17 | connects | text | 节点连线信息 |
>> > | 18 | resource | varchar(255) | 资源文件标识 , 以逗号分隔 |
>> > | 19 | datasource | varchar(255) | 数据源标识 , 以逗号分隔 |
>> >
>> >
>> > 3.明确下次会议待讨论问题
>> > 3.1. 工作流定义表是拆成两张表还是拆成三张表?
>> > 3.2. 数据源和资源文件如何存储
>> > 3.3. 工作流任务实例如何存储,不影响重跑  ,要支持编辑工作流定义等现有的功能.
>> > 3.4. 工作流定义版本问题
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 我们很感谢以下朋友的讨论:dailidong、lgcareer、CalvinKirs、Rubik-W、leonbao、zixi0825、JinyLeeChina、chenxingchun
>> > 、 BoYiZhang 等,他们对本次会议提供了很多有效的建议。
>> >
>> >
>> > 同时社区也希望更多的人能够参与进来。非常感谢你们。
>> >
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > BoYi ZhangE-mail : [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to