Did you mean user can give their expected output? When the task completed, 
compare the expected output with real output, according this, blocking or 
continuing the workflow?

Best wishes

===================
Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish
Martin Huang
[email protected]
Sent with a Spark
===================
在 2021年7月7日 +0800 AM10:10,simsicon <[email protected]>,写道:
> sorry, I mean the blocking conditions, if pre/post script returns false
> condition the node will be blocked.
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 10:07 AM simsicon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I think if the requirement condition supports pre/post script results
> > would be great, like we can run a pre/post sql to make sure the
> > input/output data is as expected.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 8:23 AM Lidong Dai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Good job, Solution 1 seems like better.
> > > By the way, I'm a little confused about why success is an option. When the
> > > task runs successfully, it will continue to execute the next task. Usually
> > > we can set "Failure to continue"
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------
> > > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair
> > > David
> > > [email protected]
> > > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dailidong
> > > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy <https://twitter.com/WorkflowEasy>
> > > ---------------
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 9:36 PM 黄智远 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry! The issue hyperlink may NOT appear in the mail. I add the issue
> > > > address blow, you can follow that to get more information.
> > > > https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/issues/5752
> > > >
> > > > ===================
> > > > Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish
> > > > Martin Huang
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > Sent with a Spark
> > > > ===================
> > > > 在 2021年7月5日 +0800 PM11:35,黄智远 <[email protected]>,写道:
> > > > > This is a new feature, let me make a brief introduction.
> > > > >
> > > > > Normally, we execute the whole workflow from start to the end. But
> > > > sometimes, we want to pause the workflow to check the intermediate
> > > result.
> > > > If correct, execution process continue. If not, pause the workflow and
> > > > inform someone to solve it. So, I propose blocking task. The aim of
> > > > blocking task is to pause the execution process properly based on user
> > > > settings. Now, I come up with two solutions:
> > > > > Solution I: Modify current node to support this feature.
> > > > > Solution II: Add a new type of node.
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to know which solution is more appropriate. If you interested
> > > in
> > > > this feature, you can follow this link to learn more about blocking task
> > > > and my solutions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > ===================
> > > > > Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish
> > > > > Martin Huang
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > Sent with a Spark
> > > > > ===================
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Thanks&Best Regards
> >
> > Zhang Zheng
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks&Best Regards
>
> Zhang Zheng
>

Reply via email to