Hey guys,

This discussion come from PR-10607[1], which currently will add
`copy_<timestamp>` or `import_<timestamp>`  when copy or import
workflow, and Xuetong was disturbed by the suffix so he submit PR to
remove them. It seems the reason we add suffix is because old arch
does not have `code` field in the database, so we have to make sure
both workflow and task name are not the same. but we already have
field `code` to identify the record in database. So I think we should
remove the suffix.

if you have any idea, please let me know in this mail thread

[1]: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/pull/10607

-- 
Best Wish
— Jiajie

Reply via email to