Hi LinFeng, Or can you explain the difference between two sub-tables of es and creating two separate tables?
Ling Miao Zhang,Linfeng <[email protected]> 于2021年2月24日周三 上午11:25写道： > Hi Ling Miao > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > In the process of using Doris on ES, there will be a table of ES, but the > corresponding two sub tables have different table structures. This problem > can be solved by building different Doris external table through different > es sub tables, but the external table of Doris will increase geometrically. > This is difficult to manage because of too much external tables. So I want > to ask if there is any better way. For example, can partitioning and > buckets solve this problem ? Or is there a better way ? > > > > Zhang,Linfeng > > > > *发件人**: *ling miao <[email protected]> > *日期**: *2021年2月23日 星期二 10:35 > *收件人**: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *抄送**: *"Yang,Dan(R&D QED)" <[email protected]>, "Zhang,Linfeng" < > [email protected]> > *主题**: *Re: Question about buckets of Doris > > > > Hi LinFeng, > > > > Doris does not support the concept of sub-tables. A table can only have > one table structure at a time. > > > > But what I am more puzzled is, under what circumstances will the concept > of sub-tables be used in business requirements. > Does it mean that ES supports one table but has two different table > structures? > Is it possible to treat these two sub-tables directly as the two external > tables of Doris? > > > > Ling Miao > > > > Zhang,Linfeng <[email protected]> 于2021年2月23日周二 上午2:26写道： > > Hi， > > Question： > Excuse me, I have another question to ask. Does Doris have the function of > sub table ? I didn't find an introduction to Doris's sub table function. IF > not, What I want to know is can Doris bucket redefine the table structure ? > Suppose that a table of ES has two sub tables corresponding to two buckets > of Doris, but the table structures of the two sub tables of ES are > different, can the two buckets of Doris also define different table > structures? Or is there a corresponding solution in this case ? > >
