2014-06-11 21:58, Lu, Patrick: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > 2014-06-11 13:45, Patrick Lu: > > > The new API rte_lcore_id2() will return an index from enabled lcores > > > starting from zero. > > > > I think core_id2 is not a representative name. > > What do you think of renaming core_id as lcore_hwid and core_id2 as > > lcore_index? > > I think this is a good idea. Except core_id is used in 13 other places. > Should I resubmit the patch with core_id renamed it lcore_hwid?
It should be in a separated patch. A patch-serie would be appreciated. By the way, I don't see any reason to integrate this change in DPDK 1.7.0 as we are in feature freeze phase. -- Thomas
