> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:16 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all? > > Why does rte_snprintf exist? It seems like a misunderstanding or broken > implementation of snprintf in some other C library. For standard Glibc, > I get same result from rte_snprintf and snprintf for all inputs including > boundary cases
It can indeed probably be deprecated in next release. Any objections? /Bruce
