Hi again David/Didier,

> Can I suggest to do an RTE_MAX between (internal_config.memory -
> total_mem) and (internal_config.memory * cpu_per_socket[socket_id] +
> rte_lcore_count() - 1) / rte_lcore_count() ? I don't think it's a good idea 
> to go
> over the requested amount. Let the last core have a chance of reserving
> slightly less memory than other cores, but don't let it go over the limit. If
> specific memory constraints are required, let the user use --socket-mem
> instead.

Sorry for spamming, but now that I think of it, I don't believe this change 
makes much sense. If the user wants memory on specific sockets, there's already 
--socket-mem option. If the user doesn't care, there's -m option, which gives 
the user memory from whatever sockets it is available. With this change 
applied, DPDK will fail when run with -m switch under certain circumstances 
(e.g. cores from socket 0 present in the coremask but no memory left on socket 
0), which is quite the opposite of a simple "give me n megs, I don't care where 
it comes from" option -m is providing.

Best regards,
Anatoly Burakov
DPDK SW Engineer

--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare



Reply via email to