Hi Pablo, 2014-11-25 13:11, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > Hi Thomas, > > As we have seen the issues we have had on previous patches due to > checkpatch,
No we have no issues because of checkpatch ;) It helps us to see some obvious errors. > would it be possible to include the up-to-date script in the > repo? I have realized that people either do not check their patches or check > them with an old version that do not catch some errors that the latest one > does, so I think this is a problem. The real problem is to clearly define all the coding rules and adapt checkpatch to our needs. > Plus, I think it would be a good idea to mention it in dpdk.org/dev, as this > is clearly a requirement for merging patches. Please, let's close DPDK 1.8 first. Then we'll have to write some documents and tools to make them approved after necessary discussions/debates. -- Thomas
