On 2014/10/29 14:14, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> ? 10/29/2014 1:49 PM, linhaifeng ??:
>> rte_eal_hugepage_free() is used for unlink all hugepages.If you want to
>> free all hugepages you must make sure that you have stop to use it,and you
>> must call this function before exit process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: linhaifeng <haifeng.lin at huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  .../lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h     | 11 ++++++++
>>  .../lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c       | 31 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h 
>> b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>> index 4cf8ea9..f6ad95f 100644
>> --- a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>> +++ b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>> @@ -172,6 +172,17 @@ unsigned rte_memory_get_nchannel(void);
>>   */
>>  unsigned rte_memory_get_nrank(void);
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * Unlink all hugepages which created by dpdk.
>> + *
>> + * @param void
>> + *
>> + * @return
>> + *       0: successfully
>> + *       negative: error
>> + */
>> +int rte_eal_hugepage_free(void);
>> +
>>  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_XEN_DOM0
>>  /**
>>   * Return the physical address of elt, which is an element of the pool mp.
>> diff --git a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c 
>> b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>> index f2454f4..109207c 100644
>> --- a/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>> +++ b/dpdk/dpdk-1.7.0/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
>> @@ -98,6 +98,13 @@
>>  #include "eal_filesystem.h"
>>  #include "eal_hugepages.h"
>>  
>> +struct hugepage_table {
>> +    struct hugepage_file *hugepg_tbl;
>> +    unsigned nr_hugefiles;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct hugepage_table g_hugepage_table;
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * @file
>>   * Huge page mapping under linux
>> @@ -1202,6 +1209,7 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>>                                              (unsigned)
>>                                                      (used_hp[i].hugepage_sz 
>> / 0x100000),
>>                                              j);
>> +                            g_hugepage_table.nr_hugefiles += 
>> used_hp[i].num_pages[j];
>>                      }
>>              }
>>      }
>> @@ -1237,6 +1245,8 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>>              goto fail;
>>      }
>>  
>> +    g_hugepage_table.hugepg_tbl = hugepage;
>> +
>>      /* free the temporary hugepage table */
>>      free(tmp_hp);
>>      tmp_hp = NULL;
>> @@ -1487,6 +1497,27 @@ error:
>>      return -1;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int
>> +rte_eal_hugepage_free(void)
>> +{
>> +    struct hugepage_file *hugepg_tbl = g_hugepage_table.hugepg_tbl;
>> +    unsigned i;
>> +    unsigned nr_hugefiles = g_hugepage_table.nr_hugefiles;
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < nr_hugefiles; i++) {
>> +            ret = unlink(hugepg_tbl[i].filepath);
>> +            if (ret != 0) {
>> +                    RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to unlink %s", 
>> hugepg_tbl[i].filepath);
>> +                    return ret;
>> +            }
>> +            hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va = NULL;
> 
> BTW, is it better to first set hugepg_tbl[i].orig_vato NULL, then unlink
> filepath?
> It may be not a good idea to first remove then set to NULL.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> 

If first set hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va to NULL,then failed to unlink you have to 
restore hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va.
So I first to unlink for less codes.

>> +    }
>> +
>> +    RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "unlink %u hugepage files\n", nr_hugefiles);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int
>>  rte_eal_memdevice_init(void)
>>  {
> 
> 
> .
> 

-- 
Regards,
Haifeng

Reply via email to