On 05/16/2018 03:31 PM, luca.bocca...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > > We have many stable branches being maintaned at the same time, and
typo > sometimes it's not clear which branch a patch is being backported for. > Note in the guidelines that it should be specified via the cover letter, > annotation or using --subject-prefix. > Also note to send only to sta...@dpdk.org, not dev@dpdk.org. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > --- > doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst > b/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst > index 2287835f9..1dc623a23 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst > @@ -450,6 +450,14 @@ Experienced committers may send patches directly with > ``git send-email`` without > The options ``--annotate`` and ``confirm = always`` are recommended for > checking patches before sending. > > > +Backporting patches for Stable Releases > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +Sometimes a maintainer or contributor wishes, or can be asked, to send a > patch for a stable release rather than mainline. In this case the patch(es) > should be sent to ``sta...@dpdk.org``, not to ``dev@dpdk.org``. > + > +Given that there are multiple stable releases being maintained at the same > time, please specify exactly which branch the patch is for in the cover > letter, in the annotation or using ``git send-email --subject-prefix='16.11' > ...`` > + s/branch/branch(es)/ How about [16.11] instead of '16.11' ? I would be in favour that the prefix(es) should always be added for this very specific case, as it will make it stand out more. either way, Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > + > The Review Process > ------------------ > >
