On 06/25/2018 05:17 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
IN_ORDER Rx function can support merge-able feature. Descriptors
My understanding of the code is that IN_ORDER Rx function only supports
mergeable feature (and it seems to be confirmed by patch 7).

So maybe change the text to:
"IN_ORDER Rx function requires merge-able feature."

allocation and free will be done in bulk.

Virtio dequeue logic:
     dequeue_burst_rx(burst mbufs)
     for (each mbuf b) {
             if (b need merge) {
                     merge remained mbufs
                     add merged mbuf to return mbufs list
             } else {
                     add mbuf to return mbufs list
             }
     }
     if (last mbuf c need merge) {
             dequeue_burst_rx(required mbufs)
             merge last mbuf c
     }
     refill_avail_ring_bulk()
     update_avail_ring()
     return mbufs list

IN_ORDER Tx function can support offloading features. Packets can't be
s/can support/supports/

transmitted by IN_ORDER Tx will be handled by normal Tx.

Can you clarify why some packets can't be transmitted by IN_ORDER Tx?

Virtio enqueue logic:
     xmit_cleanup(used descs)
     for (each xmit mbuf b) {
             if (b can inorder xmit) {
                     add mbuf b to inorder burst list
                     continue
             } else {
                     xmit inorder burst list
                     xmit mbuf b with normal xmit
             }
     }
     if (inorder burst list not empty) {
             xmit inorder burst list
     }
     update_avail_ring()

Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong....@intel.com>



Other than above clarification needed, the code looks good to me.

Thanks,
Maxime

Reply via email to