On 12-Jul-18 2:14 AM, Qi Zhang wrote:
When use memcmp to compare two PCI address, sizeof(struct rte_pci_addr)
is 4 bytes aligned, and it is 8. While only 7 byte of struct rte_pci_addr
is valid. So compare the 8th byte will cause the unexpected result, which
happens when repeatedly attach/detach a device.
Fixes: c752998b5e2e ("pci: introduce library and driver")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
---
drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
index aeeaa9ed8..dd25c3542 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
@@ -43,6 +43,17 @@ static struct rte_tailq_elem rte_vfio_tailq = {
};
EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(rte_vfio_tailq)
+/* Compair two pci address */
+static int pci_addr_cmp(struct rte_pci_addr *addr1, struct rte_pci_addr *addr2)
+{
+ if (addr1->domain == addr2->domain &&
+ addr1->bus == addr2->bus &&
+ addr1->devid == addr2->devid &&
+ addr1->function == addr2->function)
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
+}
Generally, change looks OK to me, but I think we already have this
function in PCI library - rte_pci_addr_cmp(). Is there a specific reason
to reimplement it here?
+
int
pci_vfio_read_config(const struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle,
void *buf, size_t len, off_t offs)
@@ -642,7 +653,7 @@ pci_vfio_unmap_resource(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
vfio_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_CAST(rte_vfio_tailq.head,
mapped_pci_res_list);
/* Get vfio_res */
TAILQ_FOREACH(vfio_res, vfio_res_list, next) {
- if (memcmp(&vfio_res->pci_addr, &dev->addr, sizeof(dev->addr)))
+ if (pci_addr_cmp(&vfio_res->pci_addr, &dev->addr))
continue;
break;
}
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
