On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger: > > The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic > > order but running sort showed several mistakes. > > > > This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise. > > Purely for humans. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort. > I would prefer to leave it as is. > > If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted per versions that introduced them ;-). Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable ABI. -- David Marchand
