Hi Ferruh I've uploaded my test case to Bug 183. You can determine whether it is a bug that should be covered by this patch, or it should be handled separately.
Yours, Junxiao On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:11 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 7/2/2019 9:07 PM, Junxiao Shi wrote: > > I am battling a related problem as reported on > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183 and this patch seems > > relevant, so I applied this patch on > > 196a46fab6eeb3ce2039e3bcaca80f8ba43ffc8d > > > > However, this patch does not work for me: > > with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG enabled, kni_free_mbufs's invocation of > > rte_pktmbuf_free throws "bad mbuf pool" error. > > > > While all mbufs and segments in kni->rx_q now have physical addresses, > > the mbufs and segments placed back to kni->free_q still have > > (mis-)calculated > > virtual address. The pa2va function is not working properly. > > > > Consequently, userspace side is passing wrong pointer to rte_pktmbuf_free, > > so that application crashes with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG enabled. > > > > Hi Junxiao, > > I don't see any issue in the code, and as far as I tested not seeing any > issue. > > Can you please provide more information how to reproduce the issue, is it only > enabling "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG" config? > > Thanks, > ferruh
