On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:30:26PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com> > --- > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > index 635ec36..2617037 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > @@ -716,6 +716,9 @@ rte_eal_iopl_init(void) > return -1; > return 0; > #else > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) > + return 0; /* iopl syscall not supported for ARM/ARM64 */
I guess for other architectures also iopl not supported.I think better to move this function to eal. Else this function will return 'true' for ppc64 or have at least postive logic, #if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_I686) || defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_X32) > +#endif > return -1; > #endif > } > -- > 1.7.9.5 >
