> -----Original Message----- > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 11:38 > To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.w...@intel.com> > Cc: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Yigit, Ferruh > <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; dpdk-dev > <dev@dpdk.org>; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong...@intel.com>; Kinsella, Ray > <ray.kinse...@intel.com>; > Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>; Sun, Chenmin > <chenmin....@intel.com>; Andrew > Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>; Slava Ovsiienko > <viachesl...@mellanox.com>; Stephen Hemminger > <step...@networkplumber.org>; David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>; > Jerin Jacob > <jer...@marvell.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] ethdev: add the API for getting burst > mode information > > > > > > struct rte_eth_burst_mode { > > > > > uint64_t options; > > > > > char dev_specific[128]; /* PMD has specific burst mode > > > > > information */ > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > I really don't see how we can have generic flags. > > > > The flags which are proposed are just matching > > > > the functions implemented in Intel PMDs. > > > > And this is a complicate solution. > > > > Why not just returning a name for the selected Rx/Tx mode? > > > > > > +1 only for the name > > > > > > Let me clarify my earlier proposal: > > > > > > 1) The public ethdev API should return only "string" i.e the flags > > > SHOULD NOT be exposed as ethdev API > > > i.e > > > int rte_eth_tx_burst_mode_name(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id, char > > > *name); > > > > > > 2) The PMD interface to the common code can be following > > > > > > struct eth_pmd_burst_mode { > > > uint64_t options; > > > char name[128]; /* PMD specific burst mode information */ > > > }; > > > > > > typedef int (*eth_burst_mode_get_t)(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > > > uint16_t queue_id, struct eth_burst_mode *mode) > > > > > > 3) The implementation of rte_eth_tx_burst_mode_name() shall do optons > > > flag to string converion(again internal to common code implemetation) > > > and concatenate with eth_pmd_burst_mode::name > > > > > > This would help to reuse some of the flags to name conversion logic > > > across all PMDs. > > > And PMD are free to return eth_pmd_burst_mode::options as zero in > > > that case final > > > string only be eth_pmd_burst_mode::name. > > > > > > > In fact, 'rte_eth_burst_mode_option_name' for single option, not > > for struct eth_pmd_burst_mode::option[s]. Need loop to display them. > > I see two issues with the flag approach in public API(Internally for > common code it fine to avoid code duplication) > > 1) We can not standardize all flags when it comes to HW specific > details. We should NOT pollute public API with HW specific details.
Currently, no detail to HW NIC specific. > 2) There is a danger if application starts taking any action based on > flags. It should be only for display purpose so in that case public > API should be the string to avoid misuse of the API(eventually the app > will fail on some PMD > if it takes any action based on the flag) These flags are *read only* for information. Can't image how to hack DPDK. ;-)